Intubation during CPR was associated with worse survival and brain health
"Stop chest compressions for a minute while I intubate this patient!" That refrain must have been heard tens of thousands of times during CPR after cardiac arrest before 2010, when the American Heart Association's (AHA) Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) guidelines advised resuscitation teams not to interrupt chest compressions to place advanced airways, unless a patient could not be bag-mask ventilated. There was serious concern that prioritizing airway and breathing led to inadequate circulation, sacrificing precious brain and other organs' health for the sake of an unneeded advanced airway. The 2015 AHA guidelines (and their European counterparts) further downplayed any advantage of endotracheal intubation over bag-mask ventilation during CPR. AHA and its affiliated investigators use the enormous data set from its Get With the Guidelines Registry to periodically check the class's homework in the real world. It's report card time, and as AHA reports in JAMA, Johnny might need some work on his ABC's. Among 108,079 patients selected from 668 hospitals between 2000 and 2014, two-thirds were intubated during the 15 minutes after cardiac arrest. About 43,000 of the patients who were intubated were matched using propensity scoring to ~43,000 patients who were not intubated in that same minute after ACLS initiation. Intubating patients in cardiac arrest is widely considered ideal care. But in this analysis, the patients who were intubated were less likely to survive (16% vs 19%) or have a good functional outcome (~11% vs ~14%). Intubation was not associated with a better outcome in any subgroup. There is a high chance of confounding by indication here: patients who were intubated may have had "worse" cardiac arrests, may have been more cyanotic, found later, etc. This we can never know. Likewise, the analysis depends on the minute-by-minute accuracy of code notes; this requires a leap of faith for me, but the huge data set should mitigate error there. The imperative to immediately intubate patients in cardiac arrest has an almost gravitational force at most hospitals (or at least at the 8 where I have worked), AHA's admonitions notwithstanding. Unresponsive patient: let's intubate him! Where's that crash cart? Oh yeah ... did anyone check a pulse? It just seems so ... wimpy and inadequate to bag-mask ventilate a patient in cardiac arrest. And wait, are you insinuating I can't do it? Oh yeah? Watch me! .... Um ... hey, can you guys stop those compressions for a quick second? Or if I glare at you sideways, maybe you'll not do them so darned well? Despite its large size and impressive data set, this observational retrospective study is not conclusive. Only a randomized trial could adequately answer the question of whether intubation soon after cardiac arrest is actually worse for patients than holding off until return of spontaneous circulation. Such a trial is unlikely to be performed in the U.S. The AHA's 2015 guidance that bag-mask ventilation be considered as good as intubation during CPR will likely take years to be accepted in practice, if ever. It's hard to un-teach Johnny (and Jane). It's especially hard for us to un-learn our ABCs. Don't you know they're your CABs, now? You probably forgot, because CABs sounds lame. No one sings their CABs. And all the CABs were replaced by UBER. Unceasing Bloodflow Every Resuscitation? Not great either. Anyway, don't sacrifice immediacy or quality of chest compressions to intubate during CPR, is what I think this paper (and AHA) are trying to tell us. There's likely no advantage to achieving high blood oxygen saturations after cardiac arrest; in fact, it might be harmful. So who are you trying to impress, really?
Association Between Tracheal Intubation During Adult In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest and Survival. JAMA 2017;317(5):494-506.
Whether to Intubate During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation. Conventional Wisdom vs Big Data. JAMA. 2017;317(5):477-478.