Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Hesham A. Hassaballa, MD's avatar

This is an absolute travesty. Can’t tell you how many times I have had goals of care conversations with my critically ill patients’ families when they come to the ICU. This needs to change. This has inspired a future podcast episode to further raise awareness and advocate. Thank you!

Expand full comment
cools's avatar

Great! Thanks again. This one would be curious to know if seen in other countries.

Recently had a 92yo stage iv duodenal cancer - more liver mets than actual Mets players - who had a nice 4d icu stay for sbo and aspiration pneumonia - the private oncology practice (run by private equity who have billboards and private transport vehicles for their monopolistic supply chain) told him - you have 3-6months no chemo 1yr chemo. Well the pt’s a living - +amio for his afib worsening, +ngt for 4d as exasperated surgeons really didn’t want to operate, and plus some good ol abx for that aspiration pneumonia. To be fair he seemed like a mentally strong 92 but still - no statistics allow such a statement to be offered precisely and you need to be clearer about side effects.

Would like that decision to occur independent of the numerous downstream financial incentives such a practice has.

No palliative care trigger.

Like you are giving “palliative” chemo but not requesting actual palliative care?!

*who knows how intensivists will be if/once we or ones close to us get there? In my small n of docs who go through similar - (again selecting for ones seen in the icu) it’s not a minor amount that will defer futile care and opt for onc aggressiveness.

Expand full comment
9 more comments...

No posts