Malignant pleural effusions: pleural catheters vs pleurodesis, again
www.pulmccm.org
Another study shows that indwelling pleural catheters and talc pleurodesis appear equivalent in efficacy, each with its own pros and cons in hospital length of stay and adverse event risk. Malignant pleural effusions tend to recur increasingly frequently, such that repeated thoracentesis becomes an inviable option. For these patients, talc pleurodesis or placement of an indwelling pleural catheter (e.g., PleurX) are typically advised. The optimal approach has never been clear.
Malignant pleural effusions: pleural catheters vs pleurodesis, again
Malignant pleural effusions: pleural…
Malignant pleural effusions: pleural catheters vs pleurodesis, again
Another study shows that indwelling pleural catheters and talc pleurodesis appear equivalent in efficacy, each with its own pros and cons in hospital length of stay and adverse event risk. Malignant pleural effusions tend to recur increasingly frequently, such that repeated thoracentesis becomes an inviable option. For these patients, talc pleurodesis or placement of an indwelling pleural catheter (e.g., PleurX) are typically advised. The optimal approach has never been clear.