3 Comments
User's avatar
Thanos's avatar

When a therapeutic intervention such as hypothermia shows a statistically significant improvement in neurological outcomes in a recent, independent meta-analysis—and when a benefit cannot be excluded in another meta-analysis—this signal gains further weight if it is consistent with findings from both retrospective human studies and animal research. In the absence of evidence indicating harm to patient-centred outcomes, particularly the capacity for independent living, there is a strong rationale to support its use while continuing to advocate for well-designed, prospective studies to strengthen the evidence base. References: "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38126249/" and "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38845543/"

Marta V Alvarez's avatar

A relative from Spain experienced sudden death in May 2015 during a Chicago business trip. He was 31 yrs old at the time, and had a massive heart attack. He was placed under controlled hypothermia, survived and later on got married, has two beautiful kids. He is hypertensive and has Chronic AFib, but other than that, he is enjoying life to the fullest.

PulmCCM's avatar

I am happy and relieved to hear that your relative had a great outcome after such a terrible and scary event!