Thanks for catching that! It now reads (correctly I believe) ”In a meta-analysis of 15 randomized trials (n=35,207) enrolling critically ill patients with and without traumatic brain injury, patients with TBI treated with balanced solutions had increased mortality (odds ratio 1.31, CI 1.03-1.65), while those without TBI treated with balanced solutions had lower mortality (odds ratio 0.93, CI 0.87-.98), relative to treatment with normal saline.”
(“higher” changed to “lower”) in the last section of that very long sentence.
Good morning :-)
I think you made a small mistake in the second paragraph in the Balance Fluid section which changes the meaning in an incoherent way.
Keep up the good work !
Best regards.
Jean St-Louis, MDCM
Thanks for catching that! It now reads (correctly I believe) ”In a meta-analysis of 15 randomized trials (n=35,207) enrolling critically ill patients with and without traumatic brain injury, patients with TBI treated with balanced solutions had increased mortality (odds ratio 1.31, CI 1.03-1.65), while those without TBI treated with balanced solutions had lower mortality (odds ratio 0.93, CI 0.87-.98), relative to treatment with normal saline.”
(“higher” changed to “lower”) in the last section of that very long sentence.
Hat tip to you!